4.8 Article

Oxide Catalysts with Ultrastrong Resistance to SO2 Deactivation for Removing Nitric Oxide at Low Temperature

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 31, Issue 42, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201903719

Keywords

in situ TEM; low temperature; selective catalytic reduction; SO2 resistance; steric hindrance

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0310403]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51872260, 51390474, 91645103, 11327901]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFE0105700]
  4. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [Z4080070, LD19B030001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitrogen oxides are one of the major sources of air pollution. To remove these pollutants originating from combustion of fossil fuels remains challenging in steel, cement, and glass industries as the catalysts are severely deactivated by SO2 during the low-temperature selective catalytic reduction (SCR) process. Here, a MnOX/CeO2 nanorod catalyst with outstanding resistance to SO2 deactivation is reported, which is designed based on critical information obtained from in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM) experiments under reaction conditions and theoretical calculations. The catalysts show almost no activity loss (apparent NOX reaction rate kept unchanged at 1800 mu mol g(-1) h(-1)) for 1000 h test at 523 K in the presence of 200 ppm SO2. This unprecedented performance is achieved by establishing a dynamic equilibrium between sulfates formation and decomposition over the CeO2 surface during the reactions and preventing the MnOX cluster from the steric hindrance induced by SO2, which minimized the deactivation of the active sites of MnOX/CeO2. This work presents the ultralong lifetime of catalysts in the presence of SO2, along with decent activity, marking a milestone in practical applications in low-temperature selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NOX.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available