4.8 Article

Irradiation of Transition Metal Dichalcogenides Using a Focused Ion Beam: Controlled Single-Atom Defect Creation

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 29, Issue 52, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201904668

Keywords

2D materials; defects; ion beam irradiation; nanopores; transition metal dichalcogenides

Funding

  1. NSF through the University of Pennsylvania Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) [DMR-1720530]
  2. NSF Grant EFRI 2-DARE [EFRI-1542707]
  3. Vagelos Institute of Energy Science and Technology (VIEST)
  4. NSF [ECCS-1542153]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Manipulation and structural modifications of 2D materials for nanoelectronic and nanofluidic applications remain obstacles to their industrial-scale implementation. Here, it is demonstrated that a 30 kV focused ion beam can be utilized to engineer defects and tailor the atomic, optoelectronic, and structural properties of monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs). Aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy is used to reveal the presence of defects with sizes from the single atom to 50 nm in molybdenum (MoS2) and tungsten disulfide (WS2) caused by irradiation doses from 10(13) to 10(16) ions cm(-2). Irradiated regions across millimeter-length scales of multiple devices are sampled and analyzed at the atomic scale in order to obtain a quantitative picture of defect sizes and densities. Precise dose value calculations are also presented, which accurately capture the spatial distribution of defects in irradiated 2D materials. Changes in phononic and optoelectronic material properties are probed via Raman and photoluminescence spectroscopy. The dependence of defect properties on sample parameters such as underlying substrate and TMD material is also investigated. The results shown here lend the way to the fabrication and processing of TMD nanodevices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available