4.8 Article

Paper-Based Electrochromic Devices Enabled by Nanocellulose-Coated Substrates

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 29, Issue 39, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201903487

Keywords

cellulose nanofibers; electrochromic devices; electrochromic polymers; iongels; nanocellulose

Funding

  1. Renewable Bioproducts Institute
  2. National Science Foundation [ECCS-1542174]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As environmental considerations for both the processing and disposal of electronic devices become increasingly important, the ability to replace plastic and glass substrates with bioderived and biodegradable materials remains a major technological goal. Here, the use of cellulose nanofiber-coated paper is explored as an environmentally benign substrate for preparing low-resistance (460 omega sq(-1)), colorless (a* = -2.3, b* = -2.7) printed poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) electrodes. The PEDOT:PSS/paper electrodes support the reversible oxidation of three electrochromic polymers (ECPs) (cyan, magenta, and yellow), affording the possibility for fully printed, color displays on paper. Lateral electrochromic devices (ECDs) incorporating an ion gel electrolyte are demonstrated where a magenta-to-colorless device achieves a color contrast (Delta E*) of 56 owing to a highly color-neutral bleached state of the ECP (a* = -0.5, b* = 2.9). Black-to-colorless devices achieve Delta E* = 29 and are able to retain 86% of their color contrast after 9000 switches. The switching times of these lateral devices are quantified through colorimetric image analysis which shows comparable performance for devices constructed on paper as devices using ITO/glass electrodes (10 omega sq(-1)). The paper ECDs are then combusted in air leaving 3% of the initial mass at 600 degrees C, highlighting this approach as a promising route toward disposable displays.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available