4.1 Article

Speech development after cochlear implantation in infants with isolated large vestibular aqueduct syndrome

Journal

ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA
Volume 139, Issue 11, Pages 990-997

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2019.1630755

Keywords

Hearing loss; cochlear implant; Meaningful Use of Speech Scale; speech development; large vestibular aqueduct syndrome

Funding

  1. Capital Citizen Health program to foster from Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission [Z141100002114033]
  2. Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Clinical Medicine Development of Special Funding [XMLX201514]
  3. Capital Health Research and Development of Special Funding from the Beijing Municipal Health Bureau [20111017-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Few studies on speech performance of children after cochlear implantation (CI) described isolated large vestibular aqueduct syndrome (LVAS). Objective: To investigate speech developmental trajectories of infants with LVAS after CI, and to compare with those who have structurally normal inner ears. Materials and methods: 1112 infants with congenital severe to profound hearing loss participated in this study. 150 infants in group A were diagnosed with LVAS, 962 infants in group B with structurally normal inner ear. The speech performance was assessed via the Meaningful Use of Speech Scale (MUSS). The evaluations were performed pre-implant, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months after CI. Results: The mean scores of the MUSS improved over a 5-year period after implantation in both groups A and B. The LVAS group presented similar speech developmental trajectory to the non-LVAS group at each assessment interval, except pre-operation. There were significant differences in mean scores between vocalizing behavior and oral communication skills, clarification skills of infants in both two groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available