4.7 Article

Mechanical response of Ti-6Al-4V hierarchical architected metamaterials

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 175, Issue -, Pages 90-106

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.06.004

Keywords

Structural hierarchy; Mechanical metamaterial; Elastic modulus; Strength; Titanium alloys

Funding

  1. Hundred Abroad Talents Plan of Northeastern University, China [01270021 920501*040]
  2. Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program, China [XLYC1807247]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in China [02060022119003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A snap-fit manufacturing technique has been designed for making hierarchically architected lattice structures from Ti-6Al-4V alloy sheets. By patterning the unit cell of a small-scale lattice along the struts of a self-similar unit cell of a large-scale lattice, fractal-like geometry with a hierarchy order of 2 was obtained. A subsequent vacuum brazing operation was performed to create fractal-like structures with an octahedron-of-octahedra half-cell geometry. Hierarchical architected lattices with a fractal number 4-15 and a relative density ranging from 0.7% to 12% have been manufactured by allowing a fixed small-scale cell size of approximately 10 mm and a varying large-scale cell size from 40 to 190 mm, and their mechanical responses under compression been experimentally examined. The measured compressive elastic moduli and strengths of the hierarchical lattices agreed well with micromechanical and finite element predictions. The Ti-6Al-4V hierarchical lattice materials exhibit very competitive mechanical properties when compared to other cellular materials, and provide a new solution for lightweight engineering materials for use at maximum service temperature up to 450 degrees C. (C) 2019 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available