4.8 Article

Hydrogel Nanospike Patch as a Flexible Anti-Pathogenic Scaffold for Regulating Stem Cell Behavior

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages 11181-11193

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b04109

Keywords

antibacterial; differentiation; nanostructure; patch; stem cells

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) - Korea Government [2019M3C1B7025092, 2016M3A9B4919374]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019M3C1B7025092, 2016M3A9B4919374] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vertically aligned nanomaterials, such as nanowires and nanoneedles, hold strong potential as efficient platforms onto which living cells or tissues can be interfaced for use in advanced biomedical applications. However, their rigid mechanical properties and complex fabrication processes hinder their integration onto flexible, tissue-adaptable, and large-area patch-type scaffolds, limiting their practical applications. In this study, we present a highly flexible patch that possesses a spiky hydrogel nanostructure array as a transplantable platform for enhancing the growth and differentiation of stem cells and efficiently suppressing biofilm formation. In vitro studies show that the hydrogel nanospike patch imposes a strong physical stimulus to the membranes of stem cells and enhances their osteogenic, chondrogenic, and adipogenic differentiation and the secretion of crucial soluble factors without altering cell viability. At the same time, the array exhibits effective bactericidal properties against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. In vivo studies further demonstrate that the flexible hydrogel patch with its spiky vertical nanostructures significantly promotes the regeneration of damaged cranial bone tissues while suppressing pathogenic bacterial infections in mouse models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available