4.8 Article

Largely Improved Battery Performance Using a Microsized Silicon Skeleton Caged by Polypyrrole as Anode

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages 12032-12041

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b06301

Keywords

Li-Si battery; polymer; mass production; high loading; high capacity retention

Funding

  1. UWMF Catalyst Program, UWM Research Growth Initiative (RGI)
  2. UWM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Various architectures with nanostructured silicon have demonstrated promising battery performance while posing a challenge in industrial production. The current ratio of silicon in graphite as anode is less than 5 wt %, which greatly limits the battery energy density. In this article, we report a scalable synthesis of a large silicon cage composite (micrometers) that is composed of a silicon skeleton and an ultrathin (<5 nm) mesoporous polypyrrole (PPy) skin via a facile wet-chemical method. The industry available, microsized AlSi alloy was used as precursor. The hollow skeleton configuration provides sufficient space to accommodate the drastic volume expansion/shrinkage upon charging/discharging, while the conductive polymer serves as a protective layer and fast channel for Li+/e(-) transport. The battery with the microsilicon (mu-Si) cage as anode displays an excellent capacity retention upon long cycling at high charge/discharge rates and high material loadings. At 0.2 C, a specific capacity of similar to 1660 mAh/g with a Coulombic efficiency (CE) of similar to 99.8% and 99.4% was achieved after 500 cycles at 3 mg/cm(2) loading and 400 cycles at 4.4 mg/cm(2) loading, respectively. At 1.0 C, a capacity as high as 1149 mAh/g was retained after 500 cycles with such high silicon loading. The areal capacity of as high as 6.4 mAh/cm(2) with 4.4 mg/cm(2) loading was obtained, which ensures a high battery energy density in powering large devices such as electric vehicles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available