4.8 Article

sp2-sp3-Hybridized Atomic Domains Determine Optical Features of Carbon Dots

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages 10737-10744

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b05444

Keywords

carbon domains; hybridization; absorption; photoluminescence; quantum chemistry; extended Huckel method

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation [16.8981.2017/8.9, 14.Y26.31.0028]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61701303]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [17ZR1414300]
  4. Shanghai Pujiang Program [17PJ1404100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon dots (CDots) are a promising biocompatible nanoscale source of light, yet the origin of their emission remains under debate. Here, we show that all the distinctive optical properties of CDots, including the giant Stokes shift of photoluminescence and the strong dependence of emission color on excitation wavelength, can be explained by the linear optical response of the partially sp(2)-hybridized carbon domains located on the surface of the CDots' sp(3)-hybridized amorphous cores. Using a simple quantum chemical approach, we show that the domain hybridization factor determines the localization of electrons and the electronic bandgap inside the domains and analyze how the distribution of this factor affects the emission properties of CDots. Our calculation data fully agree with the experimental optical properties of CDots, confirming the overall theoretical picture underlying the model. It is also demonstrated that fabrication of CDots with large hybridization factors of carbon domains shifts their emission to the red side of the visible spectrum, without a need to modify the size or shape of the CDots. Our theoretical model provides a useful tool for experimentalists and may lead to extending the applications of CDots in biophysics, optoelectronics, and photovoltaics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available