4.8 Article

Degradation Mechanism of Highly Ni-Rich Li[NixCoyMn1-x-y]O2 Cathodes with x > 0.9

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 11, Issue 34, Pages 30936-30942

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b09754

Keywords

Ni-rich layered Li[NixCoyMn1-x-y]O-2 cathode; capacity fading mechanism; microcracks; high-energy density; lithium-ion batteries

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government Ministry of Education and Science Technology (MEST) [NRF-2018R1A2B3008794]
  2. Global Frontier R&D Program on the Center for Hybrid Interface Materials (HIM), by Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2013M3A6B1078875]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of Ni-rich Li[NixCo(1-x)/2Mn(1-x)/2]O-2 (x = 0.9, 0.92, 0.94, 0.96, 0.98, and 1.0) (NCM) cathodes are prepared to study their capacity fading behaviors. The intrinsic trade-off between the capacity gain and compromised cycling stability is observed for layered cathodes with x >= 0.9. The initial specific capacities of LiNiO2 and Li[Ni0.9Co0.05Mn0.05]O-2 are 245 mAh g(-1) (91% of the theoretical capacity) and 230 mAh g(-1), and their corresponding capacity retentions are 72.5% and 88.4%. However, the capacity retention characteristic deteriorates at an increasingly faster rate for x > 0.95, in contrast with the nearly linear increase of specific capacity. The fast capacity fading stems from the chemical attack of the cathode by the electrolyte infiltrated through the microcracks, resulting from the mechanical instability inflicted by the anisotropic internal strain caused by the H2 reversible arrow H3 phase transition. Thus, the capacity fading of the NCM cathodes for x > 0.9 critically depends on the extent of the H2 -> H3 phase transition. Retardation or protraction of the H2 reversible arrow H3 phase transition by engineering the microstructure should improve the cycle life of these highly Ni-enriched NCM cathodes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available