4.8 Article

Macroscale Double Networks: Design Criteria for Optimizing Strength and Toughness

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 11, Issue 38, Pages 35343-35353

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b12935

Keywords

double network; elastomer; topological interlocking toughness; dissipation; metamaterials

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [17H06144]
  2. Hokkaido University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The double network concept, based on the fracture of sacrificial bonds, has been revolutionary toward the creation of robust soft materials. Based on the essence of double network hydrogels, macroscale, three-dimensional printed rigid sacrificial networks are embedded within silicone rubber stretchable matrices. Preferential fracture of the sacrificial network results in a , similar to 60 time increase in stiffness and a similar to 50% increase in the work of extension compared with the neat matrix. Maximizing yield strength while maintaining multistep internal fracture occurs when the strength of the sacrificial network approaches the strength of the matrix. Upon determining the optimal sacrificial network strength, the sacrificial bond section density can be increased to maximize energy dissipation and toughening efficiencies up to similar to 70% of the maximum theoretical toughness are achieved. High toughness and dissipation are achieved because topological interlocking enables significant force transmission to the sacrificial network at smaller length scales than interfacial adhesion, allowing much higher sacrificial bond density. This method is general and can be used with a variety of materials systems, without requiring strong interfacial adhesion, contrasting traditional composite systems. Demonstrating that the double network concept can be used at length scales far beyond the molecular scale will have important implications toward the development of future structural materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available