4.2 Article

Near-surface air temperature lapse rate over complex terrain in the Southern Ecuadorian Andes: implications for temperature mapping

Journal

ARCTIC ANTARCTIC AND ALPINE RESEARCH
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages 673-684

Publisher

INST ARCTIC ALPINE RES
DOI: 10.1657/AAAR0015-077

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Empresa Publica Municipal de Telecomunicaciones, Agua Potable, Alcantarillado y Saneamiento (ETAPA EP-Parque Nacional Cajas)
  2. Direccion de Investigacion de la Universidad de Cuenca (DIUC)
  3. Secretaria Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (SENESCYT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Near-surface air temperature variation with altitude (Tlr) is important for several applications including hydrology, ecology, climate, and biodiversity. To calculate Tlr accurately, a dense monitoring network over an altitudinal gradient is needed. Typically, meteorological monitoring in mountain regions is scarce and not adequate to calculate Tlr correctly. To overcome this problem in our region, we monitored temperature over a gradient ranging 2600-4200 m a.s.l. during an 18 month period. Using these data, we calculated Tlr for the first time at this altitude in the Andes and tested the impact of using the standard Tlr values instead of the observed ones to map temperature by means of the MTCLIM model. We found that annual lapse rate values (6.9 degrees C km(-1) for Tmean, 5.5 degrees C km(-1) for Tmin, and 8.8 degrees C km(-1) for Tmax) differ significantly from the MTCLIM default values and that temperature maps improved vastly when measured Tlr was entered, especially for Tmax and Tmin. Our results may be representative of the broader area, as Tlr in our study period is not affected by microclimatic conditions generated by differences in topography and land cover between our monitoring sites; moreover, observed temperature during our study period was found to be representative of the longer-term annual climatology of the region.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available