4.6 Article

Microwave-Assisted Activation of Waste Cocoa Pod Husk by H3PO4 and KOH-Comparative Insight into Textural Properties and Pore Development

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages 7088-7095

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b03514

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Philippines' Department of Science and Technology-Engineering Research and Development for Technology (DOST-ERDT) through Central Luzon State University
  2. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative of National Institute of Food and Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture [2014-38502-22598, 2016-67021-24533, 2018-67009-27904]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study is motivated to increase the value of cocoa pod husk (CPH), which is currently considered as waste in the cocoa farming, by converting it to activated carbon (AC). The main goal is to comparatively evaluate the impact of H3PO4 and KOH as chemical-activating agents on the resulting textural properties of the obtained carbon from CPH. Furthermore, the effects of the impregnation ratio and precursor's particle size were also examined. In all cases considered, H3PO4 -activated CPH obtained a higher yield and more desirable properties over KOH-activated CPH. Characterization of the physisorptive properties such as Brunauer-Emmett-Teller surface area (S-BET), total pore volume (V-total), and average pore diameter (D-p) also suggested that H3PO4 is the better activating agent. The highest S-BET obtained was 1237.47 m(2)/g from the 2.00:1.00 impregnation ratio. V-total (1.11 cm(3)/g) was also found to be the highest at this condition. Further analyses on the D-p and pore size distribution revealed that AC obtained from H3PO4 was mesoporous. Proposed porosity development on both activating agents suggest that KOH is a more reactive activating agent for CPH than H3PO4, as evidenced by severe material loss and low structural integrity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available