4.7 Article

A values-alignment intervention protects adolescents from the effects of food marketing

Journal

NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages 596-603

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-019-0586-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Character Lab
  2. Templeton Foundation, via the University of Chicago New Paths to Purpose project
  3. William T. Grant Foundation
  4. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [10.13039/100000071 R01HD084772-01, P2C-HD042849]
  5. FMC faculty research fund at the University of Chicago's Booth School of Business
  6. Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University
  7. William T. Grant Scholars award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adolescents are exposed to extensive marketing for junk food, which drives overconsumption by creating positive emotional associations with junk food(1-6). Here we counter this influence with an intervention that frames manipulative food marketing as incompatible with important adolescent values, including social justice and autonomy from adult control. In a preregistered, longitudinal, randomized, controlled field experiment, we show that this framing intervention reduces boys' and girls' implicit positive associations with junk food marketing and substantially improves boys' daily dietary choices in the school cafeteria. Both of these effects were sustained for at least three months. These findings suggest that reframing unhealthy dietary choices as incompatible with important values could be a low-cost, scalable solution to producing lasting, internalized change in adolescents' dietary attitudes and choices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available