4.5 Article

Animal life history is shaped by the pace of life and the distribution of age-specific mortality and reproduction

Journal

NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
Volume 3, Issue 8, Pages 1217-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-019-0938-7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [15/ERCD/2803]
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/M018458/1]
  3. Australian Research Council [DE140100505]
  4. Danish Council for Independent Research [6108-00467B]
  5. Laboratory of Evolutionary Biodemography at the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research
  6. NERC [NE/M018458/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [15/ERCD/2803] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)
  8. Australian Research Council [DE140100505] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Animals exhibit an extraordinary diversity of life history strategies. These realized combinations of survival, development and reproduction are predicted to be constrained by physiological limitations and by trade-offs in resource allocation. However, our understanding of these patterns is restricted to a few taxonomic groups. Using demographic data from 121 species, ranging from humans to sponges, we test whether such trade-offs universally shape animal life history strategies. We show that, after accounting for body mass and phylogenetic relatedness, 71% of the variation in animal life history strategies can be explained by life history traits associated with the fast-slow continuum (pace of life) and with a second axis defined by the distribution of age-specific mortality hazards and the spread of reproduction. While we found that life history strategies are associated with metabolic rate and ecological modes of life, surprisingly similar life history strategies can be found across the phylogenetic and physiological diversity of animals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available