4.4 Article

Ratification vote on taxonomic proposals to the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (2016)

Journal

ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY
Volume 161, Issue 10, Pages 2921-2949

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00705-016-2977-6

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12014/3, MC_UU_12014/12] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. MRC [MC_UU_12014/3, MC_UU_12014/12] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12014/3, MC_UU_12014/12] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article lists the changes to virus taxonomy approved and ratified by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) in April 2016. Changes to virus taxonomy (the Universal Scheme of Virus Classification of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses [ICTV]) now take place annually and are the result of a multi-stage process. In accordance with the ICTV Statutes http://www.ictvonline.org/statutes.asp), proposals submitted to the ICTV Executive Committee (EC) undergo a review process that involves input from the ICTV Study Groups (SGs) and Subcommittees (SCs), other interested virologists, and the EC. After final approval by the EC, proposals are then presented for ratification to the full ICTV membership by publication on an ICTV web site (http://www.ictvonline.org/) followed by an electronic vote. The latest set of proposals approved by the EC was made available on the ICTV website by January 2016 (https://talk.ictvonline.org/files/proposals/). A list of these proposals was then emailed on 28 March 2016 to the 148 members of ICTV, namely the EC Members, Life Members, ICTV Subcommittee Members (including the SG chairs) and ICTV National Representatives. Members were then requested to vote on whether to ratify the taxonomic proposals (voting closed on 29 April 2016).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available