4.7 Article

Impact Assessment of Biological Control-Based Integrated Pest Management in Rice and Maize in the Greater Mekong Subregion

Journal

INSECTS
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/insects10080226

Keywords

IPM; Trichogramma; Greater Mekong Subregion; biological control; integrated pest management; international development

Categories

Funding

  1. CABI Development Fund
  2. United Kingdom (Department for International Development)
  3. China (Chinese Ministry of Agriculture)
  4. Australia (Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research)
  5. Canada (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada)
  6. Netherlands (Directorate-General for International Cooperation)
  7. Switzerland (Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation)
  8. Center for International Agricultural Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CIAR-CAAS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The impact and sustainability of two interventions that have been formulated to introduce integrated pest management (IPM) into rice and maize crops in Southwestern China, Laos, and Myanmar between 2011 and 2016, and were assessed at the end of 2017. From 22 Trichogramma rearing facilities established during the interventions, 11 were still producing substantial quantities of biocontrol agents 1.5 years after project support had ended, while seven had stopped operations completely, and four were doing stock rearing only. Through the implementation of biological control-based IPM, slightly higher yields were achieved in maize and rice (4-10%), when compared to control farmers, but the difference was not statistically significant. However, the use of pesticides nearly halved when farmers started using Trichogramma egg-cards as a biological control agent. Support from either public or private institutions was found to be important for ensuring the sustainability of Trichogramma rearing facilities. Many of the suggested IPM measures were not adopted by smallholder farmers, indicating that the positive impacts of the interventions mostly resulted from the application of Trichogramma biological control agents. The following assessment suggests that further promotion of IPM adoption among farmers is needed to upscale the already positive effects of interventions that facilitate reductions in synthetic pesticide use, and the effects on sustainable agricultural production of rice and maize in the target area more generally.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available