4.6 Article

Repeated vaccination against matched H3N2 influenza virus gives less protection than single vaccination in ferrets

Journal

NPJ VACCINES
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41541-019-0123-7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  2. SEB Competitive Projects grant from the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Disease (NCIRD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epidemiological studies suggest that humans who receive repeated annual immunization with influenza vaccine are less well protected against influenza than those who receive vaccine in the current season only. To better understand potential mechanisms underlying these observations, we vaccinated influenza-naive ferrets either twice, 10 months apart {repeated vaccination group; RV), or once (current season only group; CS), using a prime-boost regimen, and then challenged the ferrets with A/Hong Kong/4801/2014(H3N2). Ferrets that received either vaccine regimen were protected against influenza disease and infection relative to naive unvaccinated ferrets, but the RV group shed more virus, especially at the peak of virus shedding 2 days post infection (p < 0.001) and regained weight more slowly (p < 0.05) than those in the CS group. Qualitative, rather than quantitative, differences in the antibody response may affect protection after repeated influenza vaccination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available