4.4 Article

Efficacy and safety of interferon-α2b spray in the treatment of hand, foot, and mouth disease: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial

Journal

ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY
Volume 161, Issue 11, Pages 3073-3080

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00705-016-3012-7

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province, China [2013RCB011]
  2. Hualida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., People's Republic of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) is a common infectious enterovirus disease, occurring mostly in infants and children younger than 7 years with potentially fatal complications. Therefore, we evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of recombinant human interferon (IFN)-alpha 2b spray for treating mild HFMD in 400 patients in a randomized, open, controlled clinical trial. The patients were randomized to the IFN-alpha 2b spray and placebo groups, and their temperature, skin rash, oral lesions, and appetite were monitored, while pathogen levels and safety were evaluated with a 7-day follow-up. The mean age of the patients was 20.1 +/- A 10.2 months. The median duration of fever, oral ulcers or vesicles (or both), and skin rash in addition to median time to regain appetite in the IFN-alpha 2b spray group were shorter than they were in the placebo group. The number of virus-positive cases differed statistically between the two groups for the three follow-up detections. Additionally, the incidences of adverse events (AEs) and severe AEs (SAEs) were not significantly different between the two groups, and the SAEs were evidently unrelated to the IFN-alpha 2b spray or placebo. Therefore, the IFN-alpha 2b spray is suitable for topical treatment of HFMD, and it rapidly relieved fever, promoted oral lesions and subsidence of rash, enhanced appetite, promoted disease recovery, and was safe for application.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available