4.6 Article

Trace doping of multiple elements enables stable battery cycling of LiCoO2 at 4.6V

Journal

NATURE ENERGY
Volume 4, Issue 7, Pages 594-603

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41560-019-0409-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0100100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51822211, 11564016, 11574281]
  3. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51421002]
  4. Vehicle Technology Office of the US Department of Energy through the BMR Program
  5. US Department of Energy, an Office of Science [DE-SC0012704]
  6. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  7. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  8. Battery500 Consortium [DE-SC0012704]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

LiCoO2 is a dominant cathode material for lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries due to its high volumetric energy density, which could potentially be further improved by charging to high voltages. However, practical adoption of high-voltage charging is hindered by LiCoO2 's structural instability at the deeply delithiated state and the associated safety concerns. Here, we achieve stable cycling of LiCoO2 at 4.6V (versus Li/Li+) through trace Ti-Mg-Al co-doping. Using state-of-the-art synchrotron X-ray imaging and spectroscopic techniques, we report the incorporation of Mg and Al into the LiCoO2 lattice, which inhibits the undesired phase transition at voltages above 4.5 V. We also show that, even in trace amounts, Ti segregates significantly at grain boundaries and on the surface, modifying the microstructure of the particles while stabilizing the surface oxygen at high voltages. These dopants contribute through different mechanisms and synergistically promote the cycle stability of LiCoO2 at 4.6 V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available