4.1 Article

Circulation patterns in the Gulf of Finland from daily to seasonal timescales

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/16000870.2019.1627149

Keywords

circulation; modelling; Baltic Sea; Gulf of Finland; SOM

Funding

  1. Maj and Tor Nessling Foundation [201500179, 201600161, 201700056]
  2. EXOSYSTEM RUSPLUS_S&T_FULL-240 project
  3. Finnish Ministry of Environment RaKi Nutrient Cycling project [7020 P-00696YMP01]
  4. Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) [16-55-76021]
  5. FASO Russia [0149-2019-0015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We studied circulation patterns in the Gulf of Finland (GoF), an estuary-like sub-basin of the Baltic Sea. Circulation patterns in the GoF are complex and vary from season to season and year to year. Estuarine circulation in the gulf is heavily modified by many factors, such as wind forcing, topography and geostrophic effects. Based on a 7-year run of the NEMO 3D hydrodynamic model with a 500m horizontal resolution, we analysed seasonal changes of mean circulation patterns. We found that there were clear seasonal differences in the circulation patterns in the GoF. Features that moved or changed direction from season to season were damped or hidden in the averages. To further study these differences, we also carried out a self-organising map (SOM) analysis of currents for several latitudinal sections. The results of the SOM analysis emphasised the estuary-like nature of the GoF. Circulation changed rapidly from normal estuarine circulation to reverse estuarine circulation. The dominant southwesterly winds supported the reversal of the estuarine circulation. Both normal and reversed estuarine circulation were roughly as common in our data. The SOM analysis also demonstrated how the long-term cyclonic mean circulation field and the average salinity field emerged from the interaction of normal and reversed estuarine circulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available