4.8 Article

Data-driven estimates of global nitrous oxide emissions from croplands

Journal

NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 441-452

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwz087

Keywords

nitrous oxide; agricultural soils; flux upscaling; emission factor; emission inventories; temporal trend

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41671464, 7181101181]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0800501, 2018YFC0213304]
  3. 111 Project [B14001]
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 29130-G27]
  5. CLAND Convergence Institute of the National Research Agency (ANR) in France

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Croplands are the single largest anthropogenic source of nitrous oxide (N2O) globally, yet their estimates remain difficult to verify when using Tier 1 and 3 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Here, we re-evaluate global cropland-N2O emissions in 1961-2014, using N-rate-dependent emission factors (EFs) upscaled from 1206 field observations in 180 global distributed sites and high-resolution N inputs disaggregated from sub-national surveys covering 15593 administrative units. Our results confirm IPCC Tier 1 default EFs for upland crops in 1990-2014, but give a similar to 15% lower EF in 1961-1989 and a similar to 67% larger EF for paddy rice over the full period. Associated emissions (0.82 +/- 0.34 Tg N yr(-1)) are probably one-quarter lower than IPCC Tier 1 global inventories but close to Tier 3 estimates. The use of survey-based gridded N-input data contributes 58% of this emission reduction, the rest being explained by the use of observation-based non-linear EFs. We conclude that upscaling N2O emissions from site-level observations to global croplands provides a new benchmark for constraining IPCC Tier 1 and 3 methods. The detailed spatial distribution of emission data is expected to inform advancement towards more realistic and effective mitigation pathways.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available