4.6 Article

Do Falls Experienced During Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation Affect Length of Stay, Functional Status, and Discharge Destination?

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 97, Issue 4, Pages 561-566

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.005

Keywords

Accidental Falls; Rehabilitation; Stroke

Funding

  1. Toronto Rehabilitation Institute
  2. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  3. Ontario Innovation Trust
  4. Ministry of Research and Innovation
  5. Toronto Rehabilitation Institute Student Scholarship (Ontario Student Opportunity Trust Funds)
  6. Canada Research Chair
  7. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MSH-141983]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To compare length of stay, functional status, and discharge destination between individuals who fell during inpatient stroke rehabilitation and those who did not fall. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Rehabilitation hospital. Participants: Individuals who fell during inpatient stroke rehabilitation (n=106; fallers group; mean age, 67.8 +/- 12.9y; mean time poststroke, 26.4 +/- 28.3d) were matched to individuals who did not fall (n=106; nonfallers group; mean age, 67.3 +/- 13.6y; mean time poststroke, 21.9 +/- 28.8d) on age and functional status (N=212). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Total length of stay, FIM assessed at discharge, and discharge destination. Results: The mean length of stay for fallers was 11 days longer than nonfallers (P=.0017). Nonfallers and fallers did not differ on discharge total FIM scores (P=.19), and both groups were discharged home after inpatient rehabilitation (nonfallers: 77%; fallers: 74%; P=.52). Conclusions: This study suggests that falls experienced during inpatient stroke rehabilitation may have contributed to a longer length of stay; however, falls did not affect discharge functional status or discharge destination. (C) 2016 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available