4.4 Review

Assessing the reporting quality in randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for postherpetic neuralgia using the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines

Journal

JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages 2359-2370

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S210471

Keywords

randomized controlled trials; acupuncture; postherpetic neuralgia; CONSORT; STRICTA

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81574061]
  2. Innovative Research Fund of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine [2019QN23]
  3. Guangdong Science and Technology Commission Foundation [2017A020213019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: This study evaluates the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on acupuncture use for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia and explores related factors. Methods: The following six databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, VIP, CNKI, and SinoMed, were systematically searched from their inception to December 2018. RCTs using acupuncture as an intervention for postherpetic neuralgia were selected and incorporated in this study. The reporting quality was assessed based on the CONSORT statement and the STRICTA guidelines. Regression analyses were also conducted on pre-specified study characteristics searching for factors associated with reporting quality. Results: A total of 137 RCTs were included in this study. The CONSORT based median OQS was 12 (minimum 3, maximum 29). Of the items comprised in the statement, ten were sufficiently reported (reported in over 70% of trials). The remaining fifty-five items were poorly reported (reported by fewer than 5% of trials). The STRICTA based median OQS was 9 (minimum 2, maximum 15). The results showed that eight of the comprised items were well reported (reported in over 70% of trials), and only three were incompletely reported (reported in fewer than 20% of trials). Based on the CONSORT statement related analysis, a post-2010 publication (beta coefficient 2.394, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.168-3.620) and funding (beta coefficient 4.456, 95% CI: 3.009-5.903) represented independent and significant predictors of a high overall reporting quality. However, only a funding source (beta coefficient 1.305, 95% CI 0.219-2.391) was associated with an increased OQS based on STRICTA analysis. Conclusion: The findings indicated that RCTs on acupuncture for PHN generally had a suboptimal reporting quality, a situation that improved for those published after 2010 or with funding sources. Therefore, rigorous adherence to the CONSORT statement and the STRICTA guidelines should be emphasized in future studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available