4.8 Article

Fecal Metabolomics and Potential Biomarkers for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Journal

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00976

Keywords

feces; metabolomics; biomarker; systemic lupus erythematosus; liquid chromatography; mass spectrometry

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81871712]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China [2016A030313525]
  3. Guangzhou Science and Technology Program key projects [201604040003]
  4. Presidential Foundation of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University [2017C024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The role of metabolomics in autoimmune diseases has been a rapidly expanding area in researches over the last decade, while its pathophysiologic impact on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) remains poorly elucidated. In this study, we analyzed the metabolic profiling of fecal samples from SLE patients and healthy controls based on ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography equipped with mass spectrometry for exploring the potential biomarkers of SLE. The results showed that 23 differential metabolites and 5 perturbed pathways were identified between the two groups, including aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, thiamine metabolism, nitrogen metabolism, tryptophan metabolism, and cyanoamino acid metabolism. In addition, logistic regression and ROC analysis were used to establish a diagnostic model for distinguishing SLE patients from healthy controls. The combined model of fecal PG 27: 2 and proline achieved an area under the ROC curve of 0.846, and had a good diagnostic efficacy. In the present study, we analyzed the correlations between fecal metabolic perturbations and SLE pathogenesis. In summary, we firstly illustrate the comprehensive metabolic profiles of feces in SLE patients, suggesting that the fecalmetabolites could be used as the potential non-invasive biomarkers for SLE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available