4.7 Article

Post-combustion CO2 capture by RVPSA in a large-scale steam reforming plant

Journal

JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION
Volume 32, Issue -, Pages 53-65

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2019.02.012

Keywords

Steam reforming; Chemical process simulation; Sensitivity analysis; Rapid vacuum pressure swing adsorption

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Steam reforming (SR) of natural gas is the most widespread process to produce hydrogen. This paper presents a comprehensive simulation of an industrial plant for hydrogen production for the internal use in a refinery industrial complex based on the SR of different feedstocks. The reference plant is a 42,000 Nm(3)/h hydrogen production unit located in the South of Italy in the Refinery of Milazzo, Sicily. Hydrogen is produced from light gaseous hydrocarbons and purified by means of pressure swing adsorption technology. In the present work, a process simulation has been built on scientific basis and validated against field data at different feedstocks and operating conditions. The model correctly predicts the effect of relevant process parameters such as reformer feed pressure and temperature, steam to carbon ratio and plant load. In addition, the paper proposes the design of an industrial-scale rapid vacuum pressure swing adsorption (RVPSA) unit which was designed and simulated to capture carbon dioxide from the flue gas exiting the steam reformer. The RVPSA unit was integrated in the current plant enabling the concentration of CO2 with a purity of 96.64%, an overall recovery of 90.84% and a specific energy consumption of 628.93 kJ/kgCO(2), thus meeting the requirements for transportation and geological storage. An energetic efficiency calculation was introduced to quantify the effectiveness of the hydrogen conversion process and to predict the effect of CO2 capture and some process parameters to the overall H-2 production efficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available