4.5 Article

Investigation of Dimethyl Carbonate and Propylene Carbonate Mixtures for LiNi0.6Mn0.2Co0.2O2-Li4Ti5O12 Cells

Journal

CHEMELECTROCHEM
Volume 6, Issue 13, Pages 3429-3436

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/celc.201900672

Keywords

ageing; electrolyte stability; lithium-ion battery; low temperature; photoelectron spectroscopy

Funding

  1. Swedish Energy Agency [37725-1]
  2. Swedish Electromobility Centre (SEC)
  3. STandUP for Energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has recently been shown that ethylene carbonate (EC) experience poor stability at high potentials in lithium-ion batteries, and development of electrolytes without EC, not least using ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC), has therefore been suggested in order to improve the capacity retention. In this context, we here explore another alternative electrolyte system consisting of propylene carbonate (PC) and dimethyl carbonate (DMC) mixtures in NMC-LTO (LiNi0.6Mn0.2Co0.2O2, Li4Ti5O12) cells cycled up to 2.95 V. While PC experience wettability problems and DMC has difficulties dissolving LiPF6 salt, blends between these could possess complementary properties. The electrolyte blend showed superior cycling performance at sub-zero temperatures compared to EC-containing counterparts. At 30 degrees C, however, the PC-DMC electrolyte did not show any major improvement in electrochemical properties for the NMC-LTO cell chemistry. Photoelectron spectroscopy measurements showed that thin surface layers were detected on both NMC (622) and LTO electrodes in all investigated electrolytes. The results suggest that both PC and EC will react on the electrodes, but with EC forming thinner layers comprising more carbonates. Moreover, the electrochemical stability at high electrochemical potentials is similar for the studied electrolytes, which is surprising considering that most are free from the reactive EC component.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available