4.5 Article

Development of a Prototype Immunohistochemistry Assay to Measure Programmed Death Ligand-1 Expression in Tumor Tissue

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE
Volume 140, Issue 11, Pages 1259-1266

Publisher

COLL AMER PATHOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2015-0544-OA

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Merck Sharp Dohme Corp
  2. Merck Co, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context.-With the abundance of therapeutics targeted against programmed death receptor-1 and its ligand (PDL1) that are currently approved or in clinical development, there is interest in identifying those patients most likely to respond to these drugs. Expression of PD-L1 may be an indicator of an initial and robust inflammatory response to the presence of tumor cells. Therefore, tumors that express PD-L1 may be the most likely to respond to therapies that interrupt the negative feedback mechanism that leads to PD-L1 upregulation. Objective.-To develop a prototype immunohistochemistry assay using the anti-PD-L1 antibody clone 22C3. Design.-The assay was developed and optimized using commercially available reagents and archival tumor-bank tissue. Results.-The optimized immunohistochemistry method had high precision and reproducibility. Using the proto-type assay in 142 non-small cell lung cancer and 79 melanoma archival tumor-bank tissue samples, PD-L1 staining was observed at the plasma membrane of nucleated tumor and nontumor cells and, in some cases, as a distinct lichenoid pattern at the tumor-stroma border. Using a preliminary scoring method, 56% (80 of 142) of non-small cell lung cancer and 53% (42 of 79) of melanoma samples were defined as PD-L1(+) based on a modified H-score of 1 or more or the presence of a distinctive staining pattern at the tumor-stroma interface. Conclusions.-The immunohistochemistry assay using the anti-PD-L1 antibody 22C3 merits further investigation in clinical trials and prevalence assessments to further understand the prognostic and predictive value of PD-L1 expression in cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available