4.8 Article

Goldschmidt-rule-deviated perovskite CsPbIBr2by barium substitution for efficient solar cells

Journal

NANO ENERGY
Volume 61, Issue -, Pages 165-172

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.04.066

Keywords

Barium substitution; Inorganic perovskite; Goldschmidt rule; Tolerance factor; Perovskite solar cells

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China of China [21805274, 61674098]
  2. Doctor Startup Foundation of Liaoning Province [20180540099]
  3. 111 Project [B1404]
  4. National Key Research Program of China [2016YFA0202403]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

All-inorganic Br-rich perovskite photovoltaics with excellent stability have gained ever-increasing attention despite their slightly lower efficiency. Nowadays, trace heteroatom substitution has become a plausible approach to optimize perovskite properties as well as device performance. However, the substitution is limited by the Goldschmidt tolerance factor (t, 0.8 < t < 1.0), leading to the situation that the alternative deviating from the Goldschmidt rule is always overlooked, let alone utilized to enhance performance. Given this, Ba(II) is partially substituted for Pb(II) in CsPbIBr2 to investigate how the dopants-induced deviation from the Goldschmidt rule would affect perovskite property. Intriguingly, the result verifies that Ba(II) enables increased the grain size and enhances the crystallinity of CsPbIBr2. As such, the trap state density is reduced and the non-radiative recombination in the perovskite is suppressed. These advantages bring about an increase of the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of Ba(II)-doped devices to 10.51%, outperforming that (8.4%) of the pristine counterpart. In addition, the perovskite stability is immune to Ba(II) substitution, even though it inflates the perovskite crystal lattice. These findings indicate that the perovskite films are tolerant to homovalent heteroatoms with a larger radius, stimulating further development of perovskite substitution engineering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available