4.5 Article

Correlations between PM2.5 and Ozone over China and Associated Underlying Reasons

Journal

ATMOSPHERE
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos10070352

Keywords

PM2.5; ozone; correlation; temperature

Funding

  1. University Natural Science Research Foundation of Jiangsu Province [18KJB170012]
  2. Startup Foundation for Introducing Talent of NUIST [2018r007]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91744311]
  4. Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX18_1018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the spatial-temporal characteristics of the correlations between observed PM2.5 and O-3 over China at a national-scale level, and examined the underlying reasons for the varying PM2.5-O-3 correlations by using a chemical transport model. The PM2.5 concentrations were positively correlated with O-3 concentrations for most regions and seasons over China, while negative correlations were mainly observed in northern China during winter. The strongest positive PM2.5-O-3 correlations with correlation coefficients (r) larger than +0.7 existed in southern China during July, and the strongest negative correlations (r < -0.5) were observed in northern China during January. It was a very interesting phenomenon that the positive PM2.5-O-3 correlations prevailed for high air temperature samples, while the negative correlations were generally found in cold environments. Together, the effective inhibitory effect of PM2.5 on O-3 generation by reducing photolysis rates and the strong titration effect of freshly emitted NO with O-3 contributed to the strongest negative PM2.5-O-3 correlations in northern China during January (i.e., in cold environments). The strongest positive correlations in southern China during July (i.e., at high temperature), however, were mainly attributed to the promoting effect of high O-3 concentration and active photochemical activity on secondary particle formation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available