4.6 Article

Green Process for Extraction of Lignin by the Microwave-Assisted Ionic Liquid Approach: Toward Biomass Biorefinery and Lignin Characterization

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 7, Issue 15, Pages 13062-13072

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b02166

Keywords

Lignin; Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE); Ionic liquid; HSQC; Biorefinery

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41702367, 21706154]
  2. Shaanxi Natural Science Fund [2017JQ2042]
  3. Central Universities of Chang'an University [300102299203]
  4. Beijing Forestry University [2017-17]
  5. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0307903]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A facile and efficient strategy for the extraction of lignin and lignocellulosic biomass processing is crucial for sustainability of current biorefineries. In this work, lignin was extracted from eucalyptus by a ionic liquid-based microwave-assisted approach. The lignin samples were analyzed and compared to evaluate the extraction efficiency of the approach in terms of yields, associated sugars, and S/G ratios. It was found that 97.6% (w/w) of eucalyptus biomass was extracted by ILs-MAE process at 140 degrees C and 24.6% of lignin (based on Klason lignin) was released. Nearly half the amount of lignin (45.8%) was extracted by [C2C1 im][OAc] under low-intensity microwave irradiations. Changes in microwave power showed great changes in biomass deconstruction and lignin extraction by ILs. The 2D HSQC NMR results indicated that more number of C-C and C-O-C bonds could be degraded by this green extraction process. The depolymerization mechanism of the lignin extracted by IL-MAE process was proposed. This study provides panoramic perspectives of the green avenues for lignin extraction and depolymerization of biomass and helps us to develop more cost-effective strategies for biomass biorefineries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available