4.6 Article

Key Factors Influencing Wider Adoption of Blue-Green Infrastructure in Developing Cities

Journal

WATER
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w11061234

Keywords

flood risk management; Blue-Green Infrastructure; urban landscape; urban planning policy

Funding

  1. Newton Institutional Links/INSINAS-KLN scheme [GA261682033, 397-05/UN7.5.1/PG/2017, 101-59/UN7.P4.3/PP/2018]
  2. Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia
  3. British Council of the Republic of Indonesia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Numerous fast-growing coastal cities in the Global South are exposed to coastal, fluvial and pluvial floods, as a consequence of decades-long rapid urbanisation and weak enforcement of planning regulations. Integrating Blue-Green Infrastructure (BGI) concepts into the development of the urban landscape has the potential to increase flood resilience and offer broader environmental benefits. BGI is an innovative approach that combines water management and green infrastructure to maintain natural water cycles and enhance environmental and urban renewal. This paper identifies socio-economic, cultural and political challenges influencing BGI adoption in Semarang city in Indonesia. Data was collected from residents of three communities through interviews (n=30), questionnaires (n=180) and focus groups with policymakers and community representatives. The combined quantitative and qualitative data provide an understanding of the specific socio-economic, cultural and political issues at play and reveal flood experience as well as perceptions of community members regarding flood management. Challenges are presented from the point of view of residents and local policymakers and are based on a framework for facilitating local BGI adoption, setting the principles of inclusive, appropriate and proactive as pre-conditions for enhancing community resilience to flooding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available