4.7 Review

An Eye on Staphylococcus aureus Toxins: Roles in Ocular Damage and Inflammation

Journal

TOXINS
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins11060356

Keywords

toxins; enzymes; Staphylococcus aureus; eye; infection; in vivo models

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01EY028810, R01EY024140, R01EY025947, R21EY02806]
  2. NEI Vision Core Grant [P30EY027125]
  3. Research to Prevent Blindness
  4. Presbyterian Health Foundation Equipment Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a common pathogen of the eye, capable of infecting external tissues such as the tear duct, conjunctiva, and the cornea, as well the inner and more delicate anterior and posterior chambers. S. aureus produces numerous toxins and enzymes capable of causing profound damage to tissues and organs, as well as modulating the immune response to these infections. Unfortunately, in the context of ocular infections, this can mean blindness for the patient. The role of alpha -toxin in corneal infection (keratitis) and infection of the interior of the eye (endophthalmitis) has been well established by comparing virulence in animal models and alpha -toxin-deficient isogenic mutants with their wild-type parental strains. The importance of other toxins, such as beta -toxin, gamma -toxin, and Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), have been analyzed to a lesser degree and their roles in eye infections are less clear. Other toxins such as the phenol-soluble modulins have yet to be examined in any animal models for their contributions to virulence in eye infections. This review discusses the state of current knowledge of the roles of S. aureus toxins in eye infections and the controversies existing as a result of the use of different infection models. The strengths and limitations of these ocular infection models are discussed, as well as the need for physiological relevance in the study of staphylococcal toxins in these models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available