4.7 Article

Stereolithographic 3D Printing-Based Hierarchically Cellular Lattices for High-Performance Quasi-Solid Supercapacitor

Journal

NANO-MICRO LETTERS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s40820-019-0280-2

Keywords

3D printing; Lattices; Graphene; Supercapacitor; Porous structure; Stereolithography

Funding

  1. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China [CityU11216515]
  2. City University of Hong Kong [7005070, 9667153]
  3. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee [JCYJ20170818103206501]
  4. Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2017JM5003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

3D printing-based supercapacitors have been extensively explored, yet the rigid rheological requirement for corresponding ink preparation significantly limits the manufacturing of true 3D architecture in achieving superior energy storage. We proposed the stereolithographic technique to fabricate the metallic composite lattices with octet-truss arrangement by using electroless plating and engineering the 3D hierarchically porous graphene onto the scaffolds to build the hierarchically cellular lattices in quasi-solid supercapacitor application. The supercapacitor device that is composed of composite lattices span several pore size orders from nm to mm holds promising behavior on the areal capacitance (57.75 mF cm(-2)), rate capability (70% retention, 2-40 mA cm(-2)), and long lifespan (96% after 5000 cycles), as well as superior energy density of 0.008 m Wh cm(-2), which are comparable to the state-of-the-art carbon-based supercapacitor. By synergistically combining this facile stereolithographic 3D printing technology with the hierarchically porous graphene architecture, we provide a novel route of manufacturing energy storage device as well as new insight into building other high-performance functional electronics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available