4.4 Article

The association between a history of gestational diabetes mellitus and future risk for female malignancies

Journal

ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS
Volume 295, Issue 3, Pages 731-736

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-016-4275-7

Keywords

Gestational diabetes mellitus; Long-term risk; Ovarian cancer; Uterine cancer; Breast cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To investigate whether patients with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have an increased future risk for female malignancies. A population-based study compared the incidence of long-term female malignancies (ovary, uterine, breast, and uterine cervix) in a cohort of women with and without a diagnosis of GDM. Deliveries occurred between the years 1988-2013, with a mean follow-up duration of 12 years. Women with known malignancies prior to the index pregnancy were excluded. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to estimate cumulative incidence of malignancies. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for female malignancy. During the study period, 1,04,715 deliveries met the inclusion criteria; 9.4% (n = 9893) occurred in patients with a history of GDM in at least one of their pregnancies. During the follow-up period, patients with GDM had a significantly increased risk of being diagnosed with female malignancies, including ovarian, uterine, and breast cancer. Using a Kaplan-Meier survival curve, patients with a previous diagnosis of GDM had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of female malignancies. Using a Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for confounders, such as parity, maternal age, and fertility treatments, a history of GDM remained independently associated with female malignancies (adjusted HR, 1.3; 95% CI 1.2-1.6; P = 0.001). Patients with a history of GDM have an increased risk for future breast, ovarian, and uterine malignancies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available