4.5 Article

Machine learning predicts per-vessel early coronary revascularization after fast myocardial perfusion SPECT: results from multicentre REFINE SPECT registry

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 549-559

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jez177

Keywords

coronary artery disease; early coronary revascularization; explainable machine learning; SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging; new-generation cardiac camera

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/National Institutes of Health (NHLBI/NIH) [RO1HL089765]
  2. [106-V-A-007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims To optimize per-vessel prediction of early coronary revascularization (ECR) within 90 days after fast single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) using machine learning (ML) and introduce a method for a patient-specific explanation of ML results in a clinical setting. Methods and results A total of 1980 patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent stress/rest Tc-99m-sestamibi/tetrofosmin MPI with new-generation SPECT scanners were included. All patients had invasive coronary angiography within 6 months after SPECT MPI. ML utilized 18 clinical, 9 stress test, and 28 imaging variables to predict per-vessel and per-patient ECR with 10-fold cross-validation. Area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) of ML was compared with standard quantitative analysis [total perfusion deficit (TPD)] and expert interpretation. ECR was performed in 958 patients (48%). Per-vessel, the AUC of ECR prediction by ML (AUC 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.77, 0.80]) was higher than by regional stress TPD (0.71, [0.70, 0.73]), combined-view stress TPD (AUC 0.71, 95% CI [0.69, 0.72]), or ischaemic TPD (AUC 0.72, 95% CI [0.71, 0.74]), all P < 0.001. Per-patient, the AUC of ECR prediction by ML (AUC 0.81, 95% CI [0.79, 0.83]) was higher than that of stress TPD, combined-view TPD, and ischaemic TPD, all P < 0.001. ML also outperformed nuclear cardiologists' expert interpretation of MPI for the prediction of early revascularization performance. A method to explain ML prediction for an individual patient was also developed. Conclusions In patients with suspected CAD, the prediction of ECR by ML outperformed automatic MPI quantitation by TPDs ( per-vessel and per-patient) or nuclear cardiologists' expert interpretation (per-patient).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available