4.5 Review

Impact of platelet-rich fibrin on mandibular third molar surgery recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

BMC ORAL HEALTH
Volume 19, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-019-0824-3

Keywords

Platelet-rich fibrin; Mandibular third molars; Systematic review; Meta-analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundThe present study investigated and evaluated the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in patients during bilateral mandibular third molars extraction by systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases were retrieved, and the effect of PRF on the healing process of the alveolar socket after surgical extraction of the mandibular third molars was evaluated by meta-analysis. The postoperative pain, swelling, trismus, osteoblastic activity, and soft tissue healing were assessed, and the incidence of alveolar osteitis, weighted mean difference (WMD)/standard mean difference (SMD), the risk ratio (RR), and the 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.ResultsThe current results showed that the local application of PRF during lower third molar extraction prevented postoperative complications. Subsequently, the pain (SMD=-0.53, 95% CI: -1.02--0.05, P-heterogeneity=0.001, I-2=75.7%) and swelling (WMD=-0.55, 95% CI: -1.08--0.01, P-heterogeneity=0.573, I-2=0) were relieved and the incidence of alveolar osteitis was reduced (RR=0.35, 95% CI: 0.16-0.75, P-heterogeneity=0.597, I-2=0%). However, no significant difference was observed in trismus, osteoblastic activity, and soft tissue healing between the PRF and non-PRF groups.ConclusionThe current study confirms that PRF only reduces some of the postoperative complications but does not prevent all the postoperative complications. PRF significantly relieved the pain and swelling and reduced the incidence of alveolar osteitis after the extraction of an impacted lower third molar.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available