4.7 Article

The strength of soil-plant interactions under forest is related to a Critical Soil Depth

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-45156-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation [DFG FOR 891/1, DFG FOR 891/2, DFG FOR 891/3]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [30710103907, 30930005, 31170457, 31210103910]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)
  4. Sino-German Centre for Research Promotion in Beijing, China [GZ 524, GZ 592, GZ 698, GZ 699, GZ 785]
  5. University of Tubingen, Germany (PROMOS)
  6. University of Tubingen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil properties and terrain attributes are of great interest to explain and model plant productivity and community assembly (hereafter P&CA). Many studies only sample surface soils, and may therefore miss important variation of deeper soil levels. We aimed to identify a critical soil depth in which the relationships between soil properties and P&CA were strongest due to an ideal interplay among soil properties and terrain attributes. On 27 plots in a subtropical Chinese forest varying in tree and herb layer species richness and tree productivity, 29 soil properties in six depth columns and four terrain attributes were analyzed. Soil properties varied with soil depth as did their interrelationships. Nonlinearity of soil properties led to critical soil depths in which different P&CA characteristics were explained best (using coefficients of determination). The strongest relationship of soil properties and terrain attributes to most of P&CA characteristics (adj. R-2 similar to 0.7) was encountered using a soil column of 0-16 cm. Thus, depending on the biological signal one is interested in, soil depth sampling has to be adapted. Considering P&CA in subtropical broad-leaved secondary forests, we recommend sampling one bulk sample of a column from 0 cm down to a critical soil depth of 16 cm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available