4.7 Article

Microbial models with minimal mineral protection can explain long-term soil organic carbon persistence

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-43026-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) [2014-67003-22069]
  2. United States Department of Energy (DoE) [79685/A001]
  3. DoE award [88723/A001]
  4. National Science Foundation (NSF), BREAD: Basic Research to Enable Agricultural Development [OPP51589]
  5. Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future (ACSF)/The Nature Conservancy (TNC) [2018-19-204]
  6. USDA Hatch
  7. NIFA [2014-67003-22069, 688228] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil organic carbon (SOC) models currently in widespread use omit known microbial processes, and assume the existence of a SOC pool whose intrinsic properties confer persistence for centuries to millennia, despite evidence from priming and aggregate turnover that cast doubt on the existence of SOC with profound intrinsic stability. Here we show that by including microbial interactions in a SOC model, persistence can be explained as a feedback between substrate availability, mineral protection and microbial population size, without invoking an unproven pool that is intrinsically stable for centuries. The microbial SOC model based on this concept reproduces long-term data (r(2) = 0.92; n = 90), global SOC distribution (rmse = 4.7 +/- 0.6 kg C m(-2)), and total global SOC in the top 0.3 m (822 Pg C) accurately. SOC dynamics based on a microbial feedback without stable pools are thus consistent with global SOC distribution. This has important implications for carbon management, suggesting that relatively fast cycling, rather than recalcitrant, SOC must form the primary target of efforts to build SOC stocks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available