4.6 Article

Emission Enhancement of Cu-Doped InP Quantum Dots through Double Shelling Scheme

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 12, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma12142267

Keywords

Cu doping; InP quantum dots; double shelling; emission enhancement; electroluminescence

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (MSIP) [2017R1A2B3008628, 2015M3D1A1069755]
  2. Basic Science Research Program through the NRF - Ministry of Education [2015R1A6A1A03031833]
  3. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)
  4. Ministry of Trade, Industry Energy (MOTIE) [20163030013980]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The doping of transition metal ions, such as Cu+ and Mn2+ into a quantum dot (QD) host is one of the useful strategies in tuning its photoluminescence (PL). This study reports on a two-step synthesis of Cu-doped InP QDs double-shelled with ZnSe inner shell/ZnS outer shell. As a consequence of the double shelling-associated effective surface passivation along with optimal doping concentrations, Cu-doped InP/ZnSe/ZnS (InP:Cu/ZnSe/ZnS) QDs yield single Cu dopant-related emissions with high PL quantum yields of 57-58%. This study further attempted to tune PL of Cu-doped QDs through the variation of InP core size, which was implemented by adopting different types of Zn halide used in core synthesis. As the first application of doped InP QDs as electroluminescent (EL) emitters, two representative InP:Cu/ZnSe/ZnS QDs with different Cu concentrations were then employed as active emitting layers of all-solution-processed, multilayered QD-light-emitting diodes (QLEDs) with the state-of-the-art hybrid combination of organic hole transport layer plus inorganic electron transport layers. The EL performances, such as luminance and efficiencies of the resulting QLEDs with different Cu doping concentrations, were compared and discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available