4.8 Article

More frequent extreme climate events stabilize reindeer population dynamics

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09332-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Research Council of Norway (RCN: POLARPROG project) [216051]
  2. Research Council of Norway (RCN: Centre of Excellence project) [223257]
  3. Research Council of Norway (RCN: KLIMAFORSK project) [244647]
  4. Research Council of Norway (RCN: FRI-MEDBIO project) [276080]
  5. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
  6. Macaulay Development Trust
  7. James Hutton Institute
  8. UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
  9. University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS)
  10. RCN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extreme climate events often cause population crashes but are difficult to account for in population-dynamic studies. Especially in long-lived animals, density dependence and demography may induce lagged impacts of perturbations on population growth. In Arctic ungulates, extreme rain-on-snow and ice-locked pastures have led to severe population crashes, indicating that increasingly frequent rain-on-snow events could destabilize populations. Here, using empirically parameterized, stochastic population models for High-Arctic wild reindeer, we show that more frequent rain-on-snow events actually reduce extinction risk and stabilize population dynamics due to interactions with age structure and density dependence. Extreme rain-on-snow events mainly suppress vital rates of vulnerable ages at high population densities, resulting in a crash and a new population state with resilient ages and reduced population sensitivity to subsequent icy winters. Thus, observed responses to single extreme events are poor predictors of population dynamics and persistence because internal density-dependent feedbacks act as a buffer against more frequent events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available