4.8 Article

The generation and use of recombinant extracellular vesicles as biological reference material

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11182-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ghent University
  2. Ghent University Hospital
  3. Kom Op Tegen Kanker
  4. Krediet aan Navorsers
  5. Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO)
  6. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [722148]
  7. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme [FP/2007-2013]/ERC Grant [337581]
  8. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research-Domain Applied and Engineering Sciences (NWO-TTW) [VENI 15924]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent years have seen an increase of extracellular vesicle (EV) research geared towards biological understanding, diagnostics and therapy. However, EV data interpretation remains challenging owing to complexity of biofluids and technical variation introduced during sample preparation and analysis. To understand and mitigate these limitations, we generated trackable recombinant EV (rEV) as a biological reference material. Employing complementary characterization methods, we demonstrate that rEV are stable and bear physical and biochemical traits characteristic of sample EV. Furthermore, rEV can be quantified using fluorescence-, RNA- and protein-based technologies available in routine laboratories. Spiking rEV in biofluids allows recovery efficiencies of commonly implemented EV separation methods to be identified, intra-method and inter-user variability induced by sample handling to be defined, and to normalize and improve sensitivity of EV enumerations. We anticipate that rEV will aid EV-based sample preparation and analysis, data normalization, method development and instrument calibration in various research and biomedical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available