4.2 Article

The Victoria Stroop Test: Normative Data in Quebec-French Adults and Elderly

Journal

ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 8, Pages 926-933

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acw029

Keywords

Norms/normative studies; Executive functions; Attention; Quebec-French

Funding

  1. Reseau quebecois de recherche sur le vieillissement
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. Centre de recherche sur le cerveau, le comportement et la neuropsychiatrie
  5. Fond de recherche du Quebec-Sante

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Despite the widespread use of the Victoria Stroop Test (VST; Regard, 1981) in clinical and research settings, information regarding the impact of sociodemographic variables on test performance in Quebec-French adults and elderly people is still nonexistent. Thus, this study aimed to establish normative data for error scores and completion time on all test trials (Dot, Word, and Interference) taking into account the impact of age, education, and sex on test performance. Method: The sample consisted of 646 community-dwelling and healthy Quebec-French individuals aged between 47 and 87 years. Results: Regression analyses indicated that age was associated with completion time and error scores on all trials. The association was also positive for low and high interference conditions. Education was associated with completion time on Word and Interference trials, and with both interference scores. Finally, sex was associated with completion time on all trials, with women being consistently faster than men. Equations to calculate Z scores and percentiles are presented. Conclusions: Norms for the VST will ease interpretation of executive functioning in Quebec-French adults and elderly and favor accurate discrimination between normal and pathological cognitive states.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available