4.4 Article

Evaluating the Effects of Various Decalcification Protocols on Immunohistochemical Staining in Zebrafish (Danio rerio)

Journal

ZEBRAFISH
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 280-290

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/zeb.2018.1697

Keywords

decalcification; immunohistochemistry; zebrafish; neutral buffered formalin; Dietrich's; CalExII

Funding

  1. Department of Biomedical Sciences at Oregon State University Carlson College of Veterinary Medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fixation and decalcification can alter protein structure in tissues, influencing the efficacy of primary antibodies routinely used in immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. Histologic examination of zebrafish requires both processes, making staining and analysis potentially challenging. Here, we investigated the effects of common fixation and decalcification protocols on IHC staining in zebrafish. We also identified zebrafish-reactive and -specific antibodies for use in research and diagnostics. For several of the antibodies, time spent in Dietrich's fixative containing 2% glacial acetic acid or 3.4% formaldehyde followed by decalcification with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) significantly impacted IHC staining quality, particularly regarding staining intensity. Protocols utilizing shorter fixation times produced higher-quality stains. In addition, individual markers were variably affected by the type of fixative. Dietrich's fixative significantly reduced staining quality for the neural markers: glial fibrillar acidic protein, chromogranin A, S100. A negative time-dependent effect of fixation on staining quality was found for several antibodies: muscle actin (Dietrich's only), cytokeratin AE1/AE3, chromogranin, and S100. Neither decalcification protocol had a statistically significant negative time-dependent effect on staining quality. Based on our results, we suggest shorter fixation and decalcification protocols to best preserve IHC staining quality as well as recommend deliberate selection of the fixative used depending on the protein of interest.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available