4.2 Review

Phenylalanine 4-monooxygenase: the sulfoxidation polymorphism

Journal

XENOBIOTICA
Volume 50, Issue 1, Pages 51-63

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00498254.2019.1636419

Keywords

Phenylalanine 4-monooxygenase; phenylalanine hydroxylase; phenylalanine; S-carboxymethyl-l-cysteine; sulfoxidation; phenotype

Ask authors/readers for more resources

1. Consistent differences in the proportion of an orally administered dose of S-carboxymethyl-l-cysteine subsequently excreted in the urine as S-oxide metabolites were reported 40 years ago. This observation suggested the existence of inter-individual variation in the ability to undertake the enzymatic S-oxygenation of this compound. Pedigree studies and investigations employing twin pairs indicated a genetically controlled phenomenon overlaid with environmental influences. It was reproducible and not related to gender or age. 2. Studies undertaken in several healthy volunteer cohorts always provided similar results that were not significantly different when statistically analysed. However, when compared to these healthy populations, a preponderance of subjects exhibiting the characteristic of poor sulfoxidation of S-carboxymethyl-l-cysteine was found within groups of patients suffering from various disease conditions. The most striking of these associations were witnessed amongst subjects diagnosed with neurodegenerative disorders; although, underlying mechanisms were unknown. 3. Exhaustive investigation has identified the enzyme responsible for this S-oxygenation reaction as the tetrahydrobiopterin-dependent aromatic amino acid hydroxylase, phenylalanine 4-monooxygenase classically assigned the sole function of converting phenylalanine to tyrosine. The underlying principle is discussed that enzymes traditionally associated solely with intermediary metabolism may have as yet unrecognised alternative roles in protecting the organism from potential toxic assault.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available