4.5 Article

Distribution and characteristics of microplastics in the sediments of Poyang Lake, China

Journal

WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 79, Issue 10, Pages 1868-1877

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2019.185

Keywords

abundance; microplastics; pollution; Poyang Lake; sediment

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41461042]
  2. Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [20171BAB214011]
  3. Science and Technology Project of Jiangxi Provincial Education Department [GJJ60311]
  4. Jiangxi Province Science and Technology Support Program [20161BBG70004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microplastics are considered to be a widespread environmental contaminant, posing a serious threat to the aquatic environment. We addressed this issue based on field observations and laboratory analysis of samples from Poyang Lake. We collected sediment samples from 10 sites across Poyang Lake during 2017. Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results showed that the abundance of microplastics ranged from 11 to 3,153 items/kg dw in the sediment samples. Except at Nanjishan, the amount of microplastics in different periods decreased in the order: December > April > July. Microplastics with a size <1 mm were the most abundant fraction in sediments, reaching over 50%. Observations under microscope revealed four types of microplastics in Poyang Lake: fragments, films, foams and fibers. Fragments were more common in sediments. Microplastics have complex surface topography, typically including rough surfaces, porous structures, cracks and extensive damage. Energy dispersive X-ray analysis indicated that most microplastics contained Si, Na, Ca, Cl and Al. Overall, the results provided strong evidence of high levels of microplastics in Poyang Lake, suggested that the microplastics pollution status in Poyang Lake should continue to be monitored.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available