4.7 Article

Sonocatalytic activity of biochar-supported ZnO nanorods in degradation of gemifloxacin: Synergy study, effect of parameters and phytotoxicity evaluation

Journal

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
Volume 55, Issue -, Pages 44-56

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.03.001

Keywords

Zinc oxide; Sonocatalysis; Nanocatalyst; Biochar; ZnO-biochar nanocomposite

Funding

  1. University of Tabriz and Nanjing Forestry University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focuses on the facile preparation of ZnO-biochar (ZnO-BC) nanocomposite prepared by the hydrothermal approach as an efficient sonocatalyst for degradation and mineralization of gemifloxacin (GMF). Morphological and textural characteristics of bare biochar (BC), ZnO nanorods (ZnO NRs) and ZnO-BC nano composite were investigated using TEM, SEM and BET analyses. Moreover, XRD, FTIR, EDX and UV vis DRS analyses were performed to study the crystalline structure, functional groups, elemental composition and optical properties of the samples, respectively. ZnO-BC nanocomposite showed better sonocatalytic performance than BC and ZnO NRs owing to its huge surface area, narrow band gap and enhanced sonoluminescence phenomenon. These properties led to the synergetic ability of ultrasonic irradiation and catalytic activity of ZnO-BC to generate reactive species and subsequent radical reactions. In addition, the effect of the addition of various gases and scavengers on the removal of GMF was evaluated. The GC MS analysis was used to verify the generation of some intermediates and a possible pathway was proposed accordingly. 83.7% COD removal efficiency was observed within 90 min treatment confirming efficient mineralization of GMF solution. The phytotoxicity test was carried out using Lerma minor and the results proved that after the treatment process, a considerable toxicity removal of the GMF solution had occured.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available