4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

Graft Immunocomplex Capture Fluorescence Analysis Can Detect Intragraft Anti-Major Histocompatibility Complex Antibodies in Mice Cardiac Transplant

Journal

TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS
Volume 51, Issue 5, Pages 1531-1535

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.01.114

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wakunaga Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd [29collaboration004]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [17K10518]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K10518] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Immunocomplex capture fluorescence analysis has recently been applied as a method for detection of intragraft donor-specific anti-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antibodies (DSA) in humans. Although intragraft DSA in humans is an intense topic of investigation, there is no report to assess intragraft DSA in murine organ transplantation. Methods. A model of presensitized mouse cardiac transplantation by donor splenocytes was used. To capture mouse MHC, anti-MHC class I/II antibodies were immobilized on Luminex beads. The MHC/DSA complexes were captured by the Luminex beads followed by detection of phycoerythrin-conjugated antimouse IgG antibodies where DSA had already reacted with the allograft in vivo. Results. Luminex beads were capable of detecting class I DSA in the cardiac allograft, though results for class II DSA were negative. Immunohistochemical investigation revealed that cardiac allografts had abundant MHC class I expression but only minor expression of MHC class II. Furthermore, MHC/class II DSA complexes were successfully detected in splenocytes and serum from a presensitized recipient. Conclusions. These data suggested that graft immunocomplex capture fluorescence analysis can be also applied in murine cardiac transplantation. This novel application in mice would accelerate our comprehension of DSA through mechanistic studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available