4.6 Article

The Effects of an IL-21 Receptor Antagonist on the Alloimmune Response in a Humanized Mouse Skin Transplant Model

Journal

TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 103, Issue 10, Pages 2065-2074

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002773

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam - Erasmus MC Medical research advisory committee (Mrace) [343564]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Interleukin 21 (IL-21) is involved in regulating the expansion and effector function of a broad range of leukocytes, including T cells and B cells. In transplantation, the exact role of IL-21 in the process of allograft rejection is unknown. To further explore this, the aim of this study is to test the effect of an IL-21 receptor (IL-21R) blocking antibody on the early phase of allograft rejection in a humanized skin transplantation model in mice reconstituted with human T and B cells. Methods. Immunodeficient Balb/c IL2r gamma(-/-)Rag2(-/-) mice were transplanted with human skin followed by adoptive transfer of human allogeneic splenocytes. Control animals were treated with a phosphate buffered saline vehicle while the other group was treated with a humanized anti-IL-21R antibody (alpha IL-21R). Results. In the phosphate buffered saline-treated animals, human skin allografts were infiltrated with lymphocytes and developed a thickened epidermis with increased expression of the inflammatory markers Keratin 17 (Ker17) and Ki67. In mice treated with alpha IL-21R, these signs of allograft reactivity were significantly reduced. Concordantly, STAT3 phosphorylation was inhibited in this group. Of note, treatment with alpha IL-21R attenuated the process of T and B cell reconstitution after adoptive cellular transfer. Conclusions. These findings demonstrate that blockade of IL-21 signaling can delay allograft rejection in a humanized skin transplantation model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available