4.2 Article

Optimal titer of anti-HBs in blood components derived from donors with anti-HBc

Journal

TRANSFUSION
Volume 59, Issue 8, Pages 2602-2611

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/trf.15393

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND The ultimate strategy to cope with transfusion-transmitted hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection caused by transfusion of blood from donors with historical HBV infection is to reject all donors having anti-HBV core antigen (anti-HBc). However, this strategy would result in a huge loss of blood donors and subsequent blood inventory collapse. On the other hand, anti-HBc-positive blood is reportedly not infectious when containing more than 100 mIU/mL of anti-HBV surface antigen (anti-HBs). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS In Japan, anti-HBc-positive blood has been used for transfusion if it contained 200 mIU/mL or more of anti-HBs. First, to verify the screening policy, clinical outcomes for transfusion of such blood were analyzed for the 2008-2012 period. Second, human hepatocyte-repopulated severe combined immunodeficiency mice were inoculated with HBV preincubated with varying doses of anti-HBs, then viremic status was followed. The effects of anti-HBs across different HBV genotypes were also investigated. RESULTS Twenty-three transfusion-transmitted HBV infections related to anti-HBc-positive blood components were identified. None of the blood responsible for these cases contained 200 mIU/mL or more of anti-HBs. When 100 mu L of plasma containing 10(4) copies of HBV and 20 mIU of anti-HBs was injected into severe combined immunodeficiency mice, no viremia was detected within 13 weeks. Genotype C anti-HBs was capable of total inhibition of genotype A HBV replication, whereas genotype A anti-HBs inhibited genotype C HBV to a lesser extent. CONCLUSION Anti-HBc-positive blood containing 200 mIU/mL or more of anti-HBs appears safe as a transfusion component. HBV vaccination seems effective between HBV genotypes A and C.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available