4.2 Article

Clinical application of backward walking training to improve walking function, balance, and fall-risk in acute stroke: a case series

Journal

TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages 497-502

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2019.1641011

Keywords

Gait; backward walking; stroke; balance; falls

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: With limited inpatient rehabilitation (IR) length of stays for patients post-stroke, it is critical to maximize the effectiveness of interventions to address their balance and gait speed deficits. Backward walking (BW) is an emerging training approach; however, its application to patient populations consistent with those in IR is limited. Objectives: To describe the effects of an additional BW training program to standard IR care on balance, walking ability and fall-risk in a heterogenic caseload of adults Methods: Eight patients with first-time stroke (5 male; average age 66.5 +/- 11.7 years; average stroke onset 7.6 +/- 1.6 days; 6 right hemiparesis) participated in 10-daily sessions that included 20 min of over ground BW training for each session, in addition to standard IR. Standard outcome measures were used to assess balance, walking ability and fall-risk at admission and post-intervention. Results: All eight patients demonstrated improvements in all outcomes with a clinically meaningful increase in forward walking speed, as measured by 10MWT. Four participants exceeded fall-risk cut-off scores for all balance-related outcome measures. Conclusions: In a diverse patient population early after stroke, individuals successfully participated in an additional BW training program. Despite the patients' acuity and severe impairments in walking, significant gains in balance and walking function were noted. This program may be useful in improving outcomes with patient characteristics commonly seen in IR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available